If even wellbeing companies can’t get this right, what does that say about the rest of us?

We tend to assume that companies in the wellbeing space do this better.

If your entire product is built around mental health, balance, and support — surely your own people experience that too.

Surely the return to work after maternity leave feels… different.

Better.

More understood.

But when you look more closely, that assumption doesn’t always hold.

And that’s where this gets interesting.


The expectation vs the reality

Wellbeing companies — whether that’s meditation apps, coaching platforms, or mental health providers — are built on the idea of supporting people through challenge.

They understand stress.
They understand burnout.
They understand the importance of balance.

But the return to work after having a child isn’t just another wellbeing challenge.

It’s a transition.

And even in these organisations, that distinction often gets missed.


What still happens

Even in wellbeing-led companies, returning parents can find themselves:

  • Coming back into roles that have moved on without them
  • Feeling pressure to quickly prove they’re still capable
  • Managing a completely different level of cognitive load at home
  • Quietly questioning how (or if) they can sustain both

Because while the company understands wellbeing…

It hasn’t necessarily designed for re-entry.


Why this matters

If companies whose core expertise is wellbeing are still struggling to support this moment properly, it tells us something important:

👉 This isn’t just about awareness
👉 And it isn’t just about intention

It’s about structure.


The limitation of a wellbeing lens

Wellbeing support is incredibly valuable.

But on its own, it tends to focus on:

  • How someone feels
  • How they manage stress
  • How they build resilience

The return to work after maternity leave is different.

Because the challenge isn’t just internal.

It’s:

  • A shift in identity
  • A shift in capacity
  • A shift in how work fits into life

And those shifts don’t resolve through wellbeing tools alone.


The risk for wellbeing companies

For companies in this space, there’s a deeper risk.

Because when your brand is built on supporting people, but your own internal experience doesn’t fully reflect that — it creates a disconnect.

Not always visible.
But felt.

And over time, that can show up as:

  • Loss of trust
  • Loss of talent
  • A gap between what you stand for and what people experience

The opportunity

This isn’t about getting it wrong.

It’s about recognising that this is a different kind of moment — one that most organisations haven’t yet designed for.

And for wellbeing companies, there’s a real opportunity to lead here.

To move beyond:

  • General support
  • Reactive wellbeing

And towards:

  • Structured return-to-work transitions
  • Support that acknowledges identity, not just stress
  • A more complete model of what “wellbeing at work” actually means

A different way to see it

Because returning to work after having a child isn’t just about feeling better.

It’s about reorienting yourself in a life and role that are no longer the same.

And that needs more than wellbeing.

It needs support through transition.


If even wellbeing companies — with all their expertise and intention — haven’t fully solved this yet, it’s a sign of how overlooked this moment really is.

Not because organisations don’t care.

But because they’re solving for the wrong thing.


If you’re building a wellbeing-led organisation and thinking about how this shows up internally — or for your clients — this is exactly the space I work in.

I share more about this on LinkedIn

you can book a call if you want to talk it through